Chatbots have come a good distance. They’re smarter, they will deal with extra info, and, probably extra importantly, they’ve adjusted to the totally different wants that we’ve got. As a part of this, most main AI fashions now have a ‘quick mode.’
In these modes, the chatbots change considering time for velocity, specializing in finishing your process in a shorter size of time, whereas additionally decreasing the quantity of data it’ll present.
So, if that is true, how effectively can ChatGPT’s sooner model sustain? In concept, these sooner variations aren’t geared up for all these issues, so is Gemini going above and past, or is that this all advertising and marketing for the sake of it?
1. The house renovation
Prompt: Plan out the rough costings of a 3-bed house renovation in Bristol, UK. The house needs rewiring, as well as a new kitchen and bathroom. Other tasks include painting 4 medium-sized rooms, carpet installation in 2 rooms and a new front door. Include suggestions for local contractors and a rough timeline for the process
This kind of prompt requires a few important tasks for the chatbot. It needs to be localized in its information, and it needs to do a lot of research in a quick timeline.
ChatGPT:
ChatGPT took roughly 6 seconds to complete this task. It started off with a very rough overall cost, followed by estimations of how much each section of the process mentioned would be.
Overall, it did everything I asked for, including the timeline, as well as individual costs for each of the parts mentioned, and even a list of potential contractors for each stage of the process.
As a nice extra touch, it included an interactive map at the end with all of the contractors mentioned and their Google reviews.
Gemini:
Gemini offered a very similar response, covering rough overall costs, tips, timelines, and local contractors. It took 2 seconds less than ChatGPT to generate, butit didn’t generate quite as detailed a plan as ChatGPT.
However, while ChatGPT generated more information, the rough costs seemed more accurate from Gemini, and were much smaller in the range suggested. Gemini’s timeline was also more detailed, giving a clear order to the process and helping plan how to go about it.
Winner: ChatGPT
This was a close one. While I felt like Gemini’s figures were more narrowed down and seemed to more closely fit the correct answer, ChatGPT included more information, covering more of the points that I mentioned. It also did a better job of breaking down different options depending on available budgets.
2. Research paper
Prompt: Summarize this document. Include a 250-word summary at the start, followed by a more detailed summary. Include bullet points of the key points and a section explaining like I’m five.
The challenge here is two-fold. I gave both chatbots a complicated and long research paper. They first have to read through and understand it, and then provide multiple different types of summaries of the information it was given.
ChatGPT:
ChatGPT was lightning fast here. In just 2 seconds, it began putting out its answer. After finishing its response, everything had taken just 6 seconds.
It did as it was asked, giving each of the different types of summaries in order. Oddly, the detailed summary section seemed to be one of the least detailed sections, offering a vaguer summary for me to work through with little explanation.
Other than this, ChatGPT did great here, especially at the speed it was able to work.
Gemini:
Gemini showed its skills here, generating a rapid response that was highly detailed, while still being understandable to someone who doesn’t have the niche knowledge needed for this subject.
Most notably, its more detailed summary probably dived into the subject, using the 250 word summary and child-like explanation to keep things simple before giving a better response for those requiring detail.
Winner: Gemini
While ChatGPT gave a more than adequate response, Gemini just about took the lead thanks to its higher level of detail.
3. The short story
Prompt: Write a historical short story set in 1872 London. It should include facts from that time, including references to the sources of this information. Sensory language should be used to set the scene and it should be from the perspective of a tailor
Chatbots have got better at storytelling over the years, but how well do they handle the task when there are extra variables to consider and an expectation to prioritise speed over performance?
ChatGPT:
ChatGPT took this task quite literally, getting the 1872 date and its job as a tailor into the story straight away. While it did use sensory language throughout, it felt quite rigid, building a very serious response to the task.
I did, however, like how it handled sources, including a list at the bottom of where the information for key facts had come from.
Gemini:
Gemini took a different approach, breaking the story down into chapters and including the sources of information throughout the text. While it was easier to tell what the sources were being used for here, it did make the text quite cramped.
This text, however, was a lot more subtle, building the scene through imagery and not outright saying each point.
Winner: Gemini
While I appreciated ChatGPT’s method of listing sources of information, this is simply personal preference, and Gemini did also achieve this task.
Where Gemini stood out was in its tone and ability to creatively set the scene.
4. Trip to Japan plan
Prompt:
You are planning a 7-day trip for two people to Japan with a total budget of $3500 (including flights from Los Angeles).
Constraints:
One person has limited mobility and cannot walk more than 4,000 steps per day
One person is a vegetarian
You must visit Tokyo, Kyoto, and one rural location
Lodging must be private rooms only
Travel days should be minimized
Produce:
A daily itinerary
A budget breakdown
A justification for each major trade-off you made
ChatGPT:
ChatGPT completed the prompt quickly, providing first the daily itinerary for the 7 days, split into each of the days, and then the budget breakdown and finally the trade offs and tips.
While ChatGPT offered more information overall, providing lots of smaller tips, fully explaining the trade-offs and outlining the complications that may arise from this trip, it did offer a much vaguer itinerary, giving one line suggestions like ‘stroll through the city’ and ‘do some easy sightseeing.’
Gemini:
Gemini gave a very similar response to ChatGPT. It listed out each day of the itinerary and followed it up by explaining the trade-offs that were made.
While Gemini didn’t include a list of tips and extra information on this prompt, it did offer a lot more detail on each individual point, explaining in detail each trade off and the justification as to why it was made.
It also gave much clearer suggestions in the itinerary section, including a daily rough step count and explanations for exact plans that could be made each day.
Winner: Gemini
While both chatbots completed the task, Gemini did so with a lot more detail and specific examples of daily plans. This is appreciated.
5. How to improve my life
Prompt: I want to improve my life. Suggest five ideas that will make me happier, healthier and fitter. They should all be backed by science, with the studies listed out in full for reference. Give me actionable steps for each one on how I can implement them into my life
ChatGPT:
ChatGPT, like previous prompts in this list, went for a more simplified version of this response. For each of the five examples, it gave a bullet point list of why it was an important life change, as well as the scientific reasoning for each.
It gave suggestions for regular physical activity, good sleep, mindfulness, a whole-food diet and building strong connections.
ChatGPT even included a table that gave weekly targets to hit for each point, as well as how to get started on them.
Gemini:
Gemini went for a much more text-heavy response, hitting me with big blocks of text for each of the five ideas. They were all fairly similar to those that ChatGPT generated, and all revolved around health, fitness and diet.
While it didn’t offer the extra bits that ChatGPT had, like the table of information or extra tips, it gave a lot more detail in the main section.
Winner: Gemini
While both chatbots gave clear and concise answers to this question, Gemini just about took the lead by offering the extra detail for each response, fleshing out its answers where needed.
Overall winner: Gemini
While both models gave surprisingly good responses despite the time conditions, Gemini just about took the lead.
ChatGPT was, in a few situations, a few seconds faster, but Gemini offered that little bit extra detail and was more specific in its answers, pushing it slightly ahead for me in performance.
Observe Tom’s Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date information, evaluation, and critiques in your feeds.
Extra from Tom’s Information
Again to Laptops
