We Did the Math: Do Entrance-Load Washers Actually Save Extra Cash Than High-Load?

Once I compiled over 15,000 information factors for CNET’s checklist of the most effective washing machines, I did not count on to see such a powerful case for front-load washers being higher long-term investments than top-load washers. 

I knew there needed to be extra to the story, so I dug deep into the information to see how lengthy it takes for a pricier — but very environment friendly — washer to offset the cheaper price of a top-loader by vitality financial savings alone. In different phrases, the payback interval.

The common payback interval for front-load versus top-load is 6.5 years. This implies front-load washers — which final a mean of 12.6 years — are typically one of the best ways to save cash long run. Now that this anticlimactic truth is out of the way in which, let’s examine how sensible it’s with CNET’s complete washer lineup.

Armed with pricing, effectivity and utility fee information, I’ve calculated the payback interval for the highest washer decide, Electrolux ELFW7738A, in contrast with each different product within the lineup — plus a notable prime washer that did not make the checklist. 

However why is that this Electrolux mannequin a chief candidate for my baseline? It is merely probably the most environment friendly washer in my dataset and on our greatest checklist. Let’s soar in to see the way it stacks up.

How I did the mathematics: Amassing information and calculating the payback interval

I collected nearly all of this baseline information in June 2025, forward of my comparability of the most effective washers — this consists of Energy Star info and most retail costs. Nevertheless, the retail costs for the fashions under are present as of January. Listed below are the statistics behind the mathematics.

• To calculate water prices, I divided the Vitality Star water utilization figures by 1,000, then multiplied the consequence by $16.83. The EPA’s WaterSense report says this was the nationwide common fee for Mixed Water & Wastewater in 2024. (This covers the water a washer makes use of and the sewer charges to take away it.)
• For electrical energy prices, I used the November 2024 nationwide common from the US Energy Information Administration (Desk 5.6.B). This report updates month-to-month, however the Residential worth as of my evaluation was $0.165 per kilowatt-hour.
• WaterSense’s report does not present state-level water-pricing information, so the electrical costs replicate solely the nationwide common, not particular person states. Try my evaluation on fridge efficiency to see how location impacts electrical energy charges.
• I mix general electrical energy and water prices into the working prices used for the payback interval calculation.

Calculating the payback interval is fairly easy

(Environment friendly washer worth – Commonplace washer worth) / (Commonplace washer annual working prices – Environment friendly washer annual working prices) = Payback interval (in years)

This tells you what number of years it can take to repay the additional price of the environment friendly mannequin. If the quantity is damaging, the environment friendly machine might be cheaper upfront. Likewise, the nearer a constructive payback interval is to the typical lifespan of a washer (12.6 years in response to the Journal of Cleaner Production), the much less worthwhile it’s.

Typically, any washer with a payback interval of lower than seven years might be funding. Nonetheless, you will see the most important financial savings when two home equipment with related costs have vastly completely different effectivity.

Filling gaps within the information

A few of the fashions I evaluated for the washer lineup aren’t within the Vitality Star database as a result of they don’t seem to be licensed — mainly the Samsung WA45T3200AW and Insignia NS-WMT41WA5. I added their utilization information manually. In Samsung’s case, it is as simple as copying the specs from its product web page. 

Nevertheless, Greatest Purchase does not checklist an annual water utilization determine for the Insignia mannequin, so we’ll have to take a extra oblique method. To calculate Insignia’s water utilization, I appeared it up on the California Vitality Fee’s Modernized Appliance Efficiency Database System, which lists it as 26.63 gallons per wash cycle.

Then I multiplied it by 295, which the Code of Federal Regulations lists as the typical variety of cycles in a yr — Vitality Star information makes use of this quantity. The grand complete for Insignia NS-WMT41WA5 is roughly 7,856 gallons per yr. Notably, this was the one spec I wanted to calculate manually for my evaluation.

Electrolux’s payback intervals throughout the washer lineup

Let’s begin with Electrolux versus the typical washer in every class. As a result of I did not have sufficient time to replace each retail worth behind the general averages on this evaluation, it isn’t as dependable because the more moderen worth information I collected for particular person washer fashions. Nonetheless, I in contrast latest Dwelling Depot costs to make sure that my older information wasn’t too outdated.

In contrast with the typical prime washer, Electrolux prices roughly $348 extra, whereas working prices are $53 decrease per yr. Dividing $348 by $53 yields a payback interval of 6.5 years, which is pretty respectable given a mean equipment lifespan of 12.6 years. 

In principle, which means that the Electrolux mannequin would spend slightly below half its estimated lifetime making up for the upper buy worth — it is all unvarnished financial savings after that. 

Surprisingly sufficient, the typical entrance washer has an analogous payback interval to prime washers in comparison with Electrolux. It’s because the modest yearly working financial savings of $16 take for much longer to offset a comparatively small retail worth hole of solely $106, in contrast with the dramatic financial savings versus top-loaders.

Now let’s slim this comparability all the way down to Electrolux versus six rivals from the evaluate, plus a bonus top-loader with best-in-class effectivity (LG WT7250C). This consists of prime washers from Samsung, LG and Insignia — in addition to entrance washers from GE, Maytag and Whirlpool. As I discussed above, the Samsung WA45T3200AW and Insignia NS-WMT41WA5 lack Vitality Star scores, so they’re typical low-efficiency top-loaders.

Electrolux’s greatest matchups

As you’ll be able to most likely guess, Electrolux compares effectively with most top-loaders. The Samsung WA45T3200AW and Insignia NS-WMT41WA5 have shorter payback intervals than common, regardless of costing lower than half as a lot. Curiously, the Vitality Star-rated LG WT8200C lags behind Insignia, seemingly due to its comparatively excessive $749 price ticket.

With an 8.6-year payback interval, the front-load GE GFW550SSNWW pushes the boundaries of Electrolux’s dominance. On this case, I nonetheless assume Electrolux is the higher long-term funding.

Electrolux’s diminishing returns

Electrolux fares a lot worse towards the ultimate three contenders. The extra nice shock is the LG WT7250C. Nevertheless, I wish to be aware that that is an excessive outlier — many related prime washers additionally price greater than this mannequin.

I am unable to say the identical for the Maytag and Whirlpool machines, which meet solely the naked minimal front-load necessities to earn Vitality Star scores. Which means the $1,100 Electrolux typically has a shorter payback interval than customary front-load items beneath $800. (That stated, it earns the highest spot on the checklist for extra than simply vitality effectivity.)

Electrolux vs. compact washers

A lot of the washers within the lineup have a capability much like Electrolux’s, so there’s much less have to account for drum measurement. That stated, Bosch and Miele compact washers are nearly half the dimensions, so it isn’t a good comparability as a result of the Electrolux will all the time take fewer hundreds to scrub the identical quantity of garments.

To account for variations in drum measurement between these fashions, I multiplied Bosch and Miele’s working prices by the variety of revolutions required to achieve 4.5 cubic ft. It is largely a tough estimate for comparability functions, nevertheless it exhibits that compact washers are greatest reserved for tight areas and smaller households that do not wash as many garments.

Nevertheless, Electrolux’s decrease retail worth implies that the payback interval cannot inform the entire story right here, so let’s examine how the 10-year prices measure up:

• Bosch: Web lack of $881 in contrast with Electrolux
• Samsung: Web lack of $986 in contrast with Electrolux

When it comes to capability, Electrolux will all the time come out on prime towards these compact items, as their increased retail costs and equal working prices maintain them again.

That stated, smaller households (with fewer garments) are higher off with a barely costlier compact washer. Should you do not account for the amount of garments, it might take Electrolux 45 years to interrupt even with Bosch and 51.8 years with Miele. Selecting the most effective washer in your wants does not all the time imply shopping for the most important one.

Electrolux vs washer-dryer combos

Lastly, I did not wish to omit the 2 washer-dryer combos on my washer checklist, so the payback interval for these accounts for Electrolux’s paired electrical dryer, the ELFE7738AA. (It prices $1,099, the identical because the washer.) From there, I calculated the mixed annual working prices for the combos and the Electrolux pair — washing and drying.

Essentially the most fascinating factor about these outcomes is that Electrox’s dryer cannot match the vitality effectivity of the warmth pumps utilized by LG and Samsung’s combo items. Finally, the combo items are higher investments — a minimum of when it comes to vitality utilization. Payback interval can also be tough right here, so let’s study the entire 10-year prices:

• LG: $323 web financial savings in comparison with Electrolux
• Samsung: $471 web financial savings in comparison with Electrolux

As a result of they’re extra reasonably priced and environment friendly than the Electrolux pair, these combo items have a head begin, and their lead will solely enhance — supplied they’ve a protracted service life. Samsung leads in general vitality effectivity and annual working prices.

Whereas Samsung saves $148 in contrast with LG, the caveat right here is that Samsung saves solely $4.94 per yr in vitality prices. A lot of the financial savings come from the decrease buy worth. It is mainly a toss-up. Nonetheless, Samsung’s 20-year motor guarantee has the sting in comparison with LG’s 10-year protection.

Learn extra: Are You Still Using Bleach? A Laundry Expert Explains Why That’s a Big Mistake