Earlier than college began this 12 months I made a decision to take my household to the Black Hills and Mt. Rushmore in South Dakota, hoping to see all the sights in solely 4 days. And I let AI be our information.
To assist me plan the journey, I made a decision to ask 5 AI completely different chatbots to create a journey itinerary. My prompts included some clear directions about visiting the Badlands, the place to get gasoline alongside the best way, a grocery checklist, what to do whereas we have been within the space, and even the place to remain.
Best at maps: Google Gemini
I wasn’t surprised to discover that Google Gemini was significantly better at routing my journey because of an integration with Google Maps. Each different bot needed to checklist the overall route and embrace a hyperlink to a map, however Google Gemini contains it proper throughout the chat interface. One other bonus was that Google is aware of the place I reside, so the route was from my particular home tackle.
That stated, this chatbot was not as useful with the journey itinerary and even refused to checklist particular locations to cease for gasoline and meals alongside the best way. Much more unusual, the bot recommended I exploit the Google Maps app on my cellphone to search out locations to cease, skipping the AI ideas.
By way of what to eat alongside the best way, Gemini listed a couple of basic objects like eggs and bacon with out something too uncommon or enjoyable. The bot didn’t truly recommend what the meal was however did recommend “important” objects like paper towels and cooking spray.
I actually preferred the suggestion about the place to remain — a KOA campground in Keystone, SD with decrease price cabins however near Mt. Rushmore. And, the AI did ensure that the whole route was below 1,400 miles.
Most confusing: ChatGPT
ChatGPT gets all of the attention these days, but as an AI travel planner, the model performed the worst of the bunch. One big glitch is that, unlike Deepseek, the chatbot routed me to the Badlands for one night. That makes no sense when you have kids, since the Black Hills are only another 75 miles away. In fact, only Deepseek seemed to figure that out.
Another issue had to do with the map. In the first itinerary provided, the map had a glitch. When I clicked, it said the results were not available. A second travel plan included a note about the map but no link. That’s not at all helpful — by a third attempt, the map finally worked.
I strongly preferred how Deepseek listed the actual meal for each day, while ChatGPT only listed a grocery list. Overall, the results were underwhelming and impractical. The model suggested stopping at six different overlooks at the Badlands, which is way too time-consuming.
Worst results: Microsoft Copilot
For a bot that uses ChatGPT technology, the results for this travel plan test with Copilot were dramatically different.
They were also impractical. For starters, the bot didn’t bother suggesting an exact route and instead merely listed a few places to see on the way. There were no estimations about total travel time since Copilot outsourced the routing to Trippy.com.
Strangely, the bot also listed a few grocery stores near the Badlands without creating a route, then listed gas stations that were not even on the route. The grocery list didn’t include the meals for each day.
I did like that Copilot found some lower cost camper cabins in the Black Hills, but in general the suggestions were minimal to the point of being almost useless.
Best pitstop suggestions: Claude
Claude was helpful at just about every travel plan task except the overall route, which was disappointing.
The main route would take my family to the Badlands with one night in Wall, South Dakota. That wouldn’t make sense since the Black Hills are about an hour away.
That said, I liked just about everything else Claude suggested. The AI was far better at identifying where to stop for gas and food, listing specific locations that were near the highway.
It was fantastic to see how the bot listed when to start driving in order to visit all of the suggested destinations, including a quick detour on day two to the Crazy Horse Memorial.
Plus, Claude kept it all under 1,400 miles by suggesting a shorter route through the Badlands (which is a massive place where you can burn 100 miles in the blink of an eye). Other than the one glitch of staying a night in the Badlands the itinerary was clear and useful.
Overall winner: Deepseek
Deepseek is my overall winner for one simple reason: The chatbot steered me in the right direction.
For starters, I liked how Deepseek listed the main “home base” for the trip: camper cabins at Custer State Park in the Black Hills. Every other bot misunderstood the “stopover” concept of the Badlands, choosing a place to stay there. But that doesn’t make sense, since it is so close to the Black Hills. Only Deepseek routed me directly to the Black Hills.
The grocery list was much more useful than what Google Gemini provided as well. The list was not that unusual — e.g., mostly eggs, bread, and sandwich meat — but Deepseek did list the actual meals for the entire trip, including breakfast, lunc,h and dinner on each day.
Similar to Gemini, Deepseek did not list where to stop for gas and food along the route, which seems odd. Where Deepseek did excel was in listing what to do on the trip.
In a brilliant move, the AI split each day into a theme. For example, day one was mostly about scenic places to visit, like Wind Cave, and day two focused more on history and monuments in the area.
I ended up using the Deepseek itinerary, staying at the Blue Bell Lodge Campground at Custer State Park the whole time, following the exact route through the Badlands, and even buying the exact grocery list and cooking the suggested meals. It was a blast!
Comply with Tom’s Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date information, evaluation, and critiques in your feeds.
Extra from Tom’s Information
Again to Laptops
